Archive Page 2

IFR Stage 2 Check - Passed

Date: 08.17.08
Flight Time: 2.2D

Whooohooo… another stage check in the bag!  My check pilot of the day was Jerry, a former airline captain with lots of experience.  It was my first experience with him, and I was pleased to find that he was a very nice guy, with a calm demeanor and friendly approach to instructing.

Prior to hitting the airways we sat down for the oral portion of the stage check, which covered topics such as the FARs, weather, aircraft systems, equipment requirements, and approach procedures among other things.  During the aircraft systems portion, I happened to mention that I was a prior aircraft owner and that I was building an airplane in my garage, at which point the conversation quickly turned from a quiz of system basics to more of a discussion of advanced equipment and related issues.  In fact, we went off into such a tangent that we had to put ourselves back on track to finish the oral portion of the check.  I didn’t mind as I found Jerry’s insight useful, and much of what we talked about will be helpful when it comes time for me to make decisions on how I will equip the panel of my RV-7

Continue reading ‘IFR Stage 2 Check - Passed’

At least I’m consistent

For the past few weeks I’ve been hitting the books and studying for my IR written exam, which is scheduled for this coming Sunday.  After using ASA’s Prepware to go through each and every question at least once, I’ve taken three practice tests and scored a 92 on all three of them.  That’s pretty good, but I’ll continue to practice and drill right up to the day of the test with the hope of improving that a score a little.

The one question that has me baffled is 4032 (I might have that # wrong), which asks you to compute the time enroute for a flight between Yakima and Portland.  The problem is that you must refer to the figures to determine the distances for each leg, and the for some reason I cannot figure out how they (the FAA) calculated the the distance for the last leg from the BTG VORTAC to PDX as 10nm.

The distance between the BTG VORTAC and MULES intersection on V448 is 18nm, and I suppose that by looking at the figure I could estimate that the distance to PDX is roughly half that difference (or 9nm), but I still want to know how the FAA gets its 10nm.   The answer is probably staring my right in the face, but I can’t find it.  If you know, leave me a comment.

GPS approach enlightenment

During my IR studies I had become a bit confused by and about the different flavors of GPS approaches.  Why certain approaches are identified as “VOR or GPS” while some are just plain ”GPS” and others “RNAV (GPS)”, was a question I could not answer adequately.  Throw in terms like RNAV, VNAV and LPV and it became even more confusing… I needed clarity and FAAST!  (pardon the pun)

I found GPS approach enlightenment when I stumbled upon this article from the July/August 2006 edition FAA Aviation News, on the FAA Safety Team’s web site.   In six pages this article did more to help my understanding of the differences in GPS approaches than any other resources I had found.   If you find yourself in the situation I was in, perplexed and uncertain, then give it a read.  It might help you put it all together as it did for me.

He has a nail file!

A buddy of mine sent me a link to this hilarious video.  More fun at the expense of airline pilots, I love it! ;) Click the screenshot below below or the link above to watch the video.

IFR practice with FSX

With my Stage 2 check scheduled for the following day I decided to start up Microsoft Flight Simulator X (FSX) and practice a few of the skills I knew I would be required to demonstrate.  It’s been a while since I’ve used FSX for practice, so I was curious what I could do (in FSX) with all my new IFR skills. 

I got out my low altitude enroute chart and several IAPs for Stockton, Tracy and Livermore and strapped on my kneeboard.  I set the weather to foggy and departed Livermore eastbound towards Stockton, practicing several Holds and DME Arcs, all with great success and accuracy, along the way.

Once I was satisfied with my holding and arcing abilities, I flew several NDB and VOR approaches into Stockton, before turning westward for the ILS into Livermore.

During my simulated flight, two things amazed me.  First was that all of the navaids in FSX used the correct frequency.  That is to say, when I set the NAV radio to the actual ILS frequency for Livermore (as listed on the IAP), FSX responded correctly and I could hear the identifier for I-LVK when NAV1 was selected on the on-screen audio panel.  It’s not that I thought it wouldn’t be correct, but I was just sort of amazed that I could use all the real Charts and IAPs and have FSX respond correctly.   I may have said this before, but I’ve never been a big fan of flight sims simply because I’ve found them to be unrealistic for VFR flying.  However, now that I can use it to practice IFR procedures my opinion has changed, and I find that FSX is indeed a very useful tool.

The second thing that suprized me was just how much I’ve learned in the past few months.  When I bought FSX a few months ago, I really had no IFR or instrument approach experience, but today I am tuning radios and turning, or in this case clicking, OBSs like a pro.  As I mentioned I had the weather set to foggy, and I was amazed to see the rabits (strobes of the approach lighting system) appear ahead through the virtual fog as I approached DA.   Regardless of whether or not this was real, I was able to navigate between several airports just by instruments when just months ago I had no clue how to do any of this.  Pretty cool if you ask me!

IFR Lesson 26: More approaches

Lesson Date: 08.13.08
Flight Time: 1.3

With my Stage 2 check scheduled for the coming weekend, and since stage 2 is all about approaches, this flight was simply more practice approaches and nothing more.  It was  a repeat of the prior flight by flying once again the VOR 29R and GPS 29R into Stockton followed by the ILS 25R into Livermore, all of which are very familiar by now.

Everything went OK, not as good as this past Saturday, but acceptable for this stage of the training nonetheless.  On one of the approaches into Stockton, I got myself about 50′ low by not applying enough pitch and/or power after leveling just above the MDA.  Oops!  It’s just one of the little mistakes that I keep making, but hey, that’s why we practice right?  OK, maybe going below MDA isn’t such a little thing, but you get my point.  What seems to happen is that after diving and driving to the MDA, I am leveling off and setting the power, but then as I turn my attention elsewhere the airplane continues to deplete energy, slows and descends.  This then has me jamming on the power to arrest the descent and climb back up the 50′ to the MDA.  Perhaps I just need to apply a bit more power or trim, but it really comes down to making sure I manage the energy properly as it is so easy to give up 50-100′, but so hard to get it back.

IFR Lesson 25: Heeeee’s Baaaaack

Lesson Date: 08.10.08
Flight Time: 1.8D 

Wow, what a difference a few days made!  I was finally able to get some rest and arrived for the day’s lesson in prime condition.  I felt different; I felt normal again (as normal as normal is for me).

We headed out for more holding practice, a few DME Arcs and of course, several approaches.  I won’t go into a lot of detail, but let’s just say that I was back in true form today.  The holds went well, the arcs great, my radio work was first-rate, and the approaches, well, they were solid!  I finally emerged from the rut that had been plaguing me for several flights.  I shot the VOR 29R into Stockton once again, followed by vectors back for the GPS 29R (also at SCK), and then headed home for ILS 25R into Livermore.  In fact, my approach into Livermore was the best approach I had flown to date with the localizer and glide-slope needles centered almost the entire time.  Nick had nothing at all to say the entire approach, so I knew I was doing well.

If I sound like I am bragging, I’m not; I am just excited to have performed so well on this day.  So please, let me just have my moment. ;-)

About the only thing from the flight that I felt needed improvement was my ability to program the GPS accurately and quickly.  I haven’t flown that many GSP approaches, and I definitely need more practice setting them up in the KLN 89B.  I’ve downloaded the KLN 89B simulator from Bendix King, but I can’t get it to run on Windows Vista, regardless of whether I run it in compatibility mode or not.  I’ll keep trying, but I am not optimistic.

With my approach skills now fairly solid, Nick scheduled my Stage 2 Check Flight for a week from today.   In the meantime, we are going to jump into Stage 3 topics; flight planning and cross-country flight.

IFR Lesson 24: Approaches - VOR 29R SCK, VOR A TCY, ILS 25R LVK

Lesson Date: 08.06.08
Flight Time: 1.3 D

The flight today was another so-so performance by yours truly.  I was still feeling a bit run-down, and it showed in my performance.  I don’t know why but for days since returning from AirVenture I just couldn’t seem to get myself into gear.  Sigh.

The flight was another attempt at Running the Gauntlet by flying the VOR 29R approach into Stockton under partial panel conditions, followed by the VOR A into Tracy, and finally the ILS 25R into Livermore.  The approach into Stockton was bit rough, but I think that was caused by the fact that I hadn’t flown partial panel in a few weeks, and was a touch rusty.  The other two approaches were acceptable, but far from perfect, with me making several small mistakes along the way such as forgetting to start time at the IAF or something similar.

Normally Nick is a very patient guy, and while for the most part he was today, I could detect by his voice and body language that he was a bit frustrated by my performance on this day.  Maybe frustrated isn’t the right word, but the bottom line is that both he and I knew that for the past two flights I just wasn’t performing at my normal level and was capable of doing better, much better.  I just needed to shake this lingering case of the “tireds”, which I was hoping I could do in time for our next lesson on Saturday.

IFR Lesson 23: Holds and an Approach - LVK ILS 25R

Lesson Date: 08.03.06
Flight Time: 1.3D

I had just returned from AirVenture the day prior and hadn’t yet completely recovered from all the fun.  I was very motivated by my time at AirVenture, but my legs were sore from all the walking I had done, and I was very low on energy.  Nick could sense my diminished physical and mental capacity and decided to take it easy on me today by keeping the lesson a bit on the shorter side.  What a guy! ;-)

We departed Livermore on our usual Livermore One departure, and I could immediately sense that I was a bit rusty.  I had only been off for about a week, but I felt a touch behind the airplane.  My general state of being probably had a lot to do with it, but it was humbling, very humbling.

After reaching ALTAM I was proceeding direct to the Manteca VOR (ECA) via V244, when Nick issued me simulated ATC holding instructions…

Hold North of the JANEY intersection on the 162 radial of the Sacramento VOR (SAC), left turns.

Sitting here at my desk writing this it seems so easy, but on that particular day in the cockpit I was having a hard time getting my brain into gear.   I started sketching the situation on my kneeboard all the while driving towards JANEY at a blistering 100 KIAS (that’s was a joke).  By the time I had figured out that I wanted a direct entry, I had flown 0.4nm past JANEY.  D’oh!  It wasn’t pretty, but I somehow managed to get the aircraft into a very rough hold, however I forgot to go through the 5-Ts yet again.  Nick was his usual patient self, but I knew he wanted better from me.  He then stressed once again the importance of calculating I-O-E for every hold which stands for Inbound Course, Outbound Course, and Entry.  OK, got it, I-O-E and the 5-Ts every time!  I-O-E and the 5-Ts kinda sounds like some sort of band doesn’t it. :-)

Nick then gave me a chance to redeem myself by issuing me instructions to hold at the BYRON intersection just 3nm away from JANEY.  I wish I could tell you it went much better, but I can’t.  Don’t get me wrong, it certainly an improvement, but not so significantly as to wipe out my prior holding transgressions.

From BYRON Nick had me fly to the TRACY intersection for one more hold and the start of the ILS 25R approach into Livermore.  The hold at TRACY went an additional improvement over the prior two, and the approach was acceptable, so I must have been starring to wake up.  Overall, it was an OK flight, and my performance according to Nick was good, but not at my normal level (whatever that is).   I was looking for something a little less stressful today and I got it, so I can’t complain.

My AirVenture 2008

Better late than never right?  I actually took my laptop with me to AirVenture with the goal of posting an update or two, but as you can tell, that didn’t happened.  I was just too busy having fun to get online! ;-)

Moments after takeoff from San Francisco I snapped this shot of the fog over the bay.

I took the human mailing tube (airlines) to Bloomington, IL, where I met up with a motley crew of RV-7 builders; Chad, Larry and John who would be my camp mates for the week.  This works out great for me, as my friend Chad has all the gear stored at his house, so I don’t have to worry about schlepping a tent and related stuff all the way from home.  When they picked me up at the airport that afternoon our first order of business was to head to the local pub for a round of beers (or two, ok three), and then onto the grocery store to pick-up more beer and snacks for the week.  Are you starting to see a trend here?

Continue reading ‘My AirVenture 2008′

IFR Lesson 22: Running the Gauntlet!

Lesson Date: 07.26.08
Flight Time: 1.6D

Ack, it’s been about 10 days since my last update.  Oh my.  I know I’ve been busy lately, but my procrastination appears to be getting worse.  I’ve got a few lessons and an AirVenture report to get through to bring myself current, so let’s see if I can keep these next few updates short and sweet.

Today was another lesson focusing on, yup you guessed it, approaches.  Actually, today was my first attempt at what the instructors around here call “Running the Gauntlet”, which involves approaches into Stockton, Tracy, and finally Livermore.  What makes it a challenge is that all three airports are very close to each other, and the IAP for each are related in some way, making for a very busy cockpit.  For example, the Missed Approach for the Tracy VOR-A approach is to hold at TRACY intersection which is also the IAF for the ILS 25R approach into Livermore.  You would think this would make it all very easy, but in reality, it can be a juggling act to go missed, fly the hold, talk to ATC, and get set-up for the ILS all at the same time.

Continue reading ‘IFR Lesson 22: Running the Gauntlet!’

NFL Flyovers… cool video!

I came across this video in the Vans Air Force forums today, and I thought it was worthy of sharing here.   The NFL won’t let you embed the video in a blog, so click the picture below or link above to view it on their site.  Enjoy!

IFR Lesson 21: Approaches - SCK VOR, LVK ILS

Lesson Date: 07.22.08
Flight Time: 1.5 D

This was a rather interesting day in the air.  Not because of anything I had done, but rather because of the number of aircraft in our vicinity.  In short, it was just plane crazy out there!

We departed out of Livermore on our standard route (Livermore One), and  after reaching the ALTAM intersection I set us up to track straight to the ECA VORTAC.  Only seconds after establishing us in cruise configuration the Zaon gave us a traffic alert.  Not just an advisory, but an alert.  Nick looked out and said, “I got him, but take the hood off”, so I knew it was real close if Nick wanted me to look.

It was a Piper Seminole, about 500′ above and 1/2 mile at our 2-o’clock and on the same heading.  His gear was out and he was in a high pitch attitude, presumably practicing maneuvers, so I altered our course a bit and we kept him in our sights.  Just before we would have lost sight of him behind our wing, he pitched up aggressively, stalled and dove to the left, heading directly for us in the process.  I quickly banked the airplane left and dove away, not because there was any immediate danger of a collision, but it was close enough for comfort and we certainly didn’t want to take any chances.

Continue reading ‘IFR Lesson 21: Approaches - SCK VOR, LVK ILS’

IFR Lesson 20: Approaches - VOR MOD, ILS MOD, GPS LVK

Lesson Date: 07.19.08
Flight Time: 1.7 D

More approach practice today, but rather than going to Stockton we headed somewhere new, Modesto.  This was a great flight as there is more distance between Livermore and Modesto, which gave me a bit more time to prepare for the approach.  Not only did I fly us somewhere new today, but I also used the autopilot for the first time.  It was really nice to have it holding course while I set-up the avionics and briefed for the approach.

Overall things are really starting to click, with my ability to process the information on the IAPs and get the aircraft and avionics ready for the approach improving greatly.  The first approach on the menu today was the MOD VOR 28R, which I requested of ATC to be flown as “Pilot Nav” as opposed to vectors.  It involved executing the procedure turn once intercepting WOWAR (IAF).  About the only mistake I made here was that I forgot to reduce the power and start a descent as overflew the fix on a parrallel entry.  This worked out OK because I was told by ATC to extend the parrallel entry a long way before being given the OK to turn and intercept the inbound course, so I had plenty of time to correct.

Continue reading ‘IFR Lesson 20: Approaches - VOR MOD, ILS MOD, GPS LVK’

Ground - Communications & ILS RWY 31 SNS (Sim)

Lesson Date: 07.17.08
Flight Time: 0.5 E

I was scheduled to fly, but the president was in Northern California for an event and several TFRs were in effect with the border of one of them just 4nm North of the Livermore airport.  Nick and I studied the TFR map for a few minutes and quickly came to the conclusion that we would stay on the ground today’s lesson as the TFR was just a little too close for comfort and flying today just wasn’t worth the risk of an F-16 intercept.  Everyone else must have felt the same way as the airport was uncharacteristicly quiet on what was a beautiful summer evening for flying.

Into the classroom we went so I could learn about IFR communications.  For the majority of my training Nick has been working the radios for our IFR related communications, but I’ve been informed that it’s my job now.  I’ve been doing little bit of the talking (with ATC) and a whole lot of listening, so I somewhat familiar with the lingo, but we did need to cover a few details before I start running my mouth on the approach frequency. 

Continue reading ‘Ground - Communications & ILS RWY 31 SNS (Sim)’

Party’s over!

I’ve returned home from what was another great week at AirVenture.  I had a fantastic time camping, partying and hanging out with several of my fellow RV builders, but I am fighting a bit of the post-AirVenture hangover today.   I don’t mean to imply that I drank too much, although I did enjoy my fair share of Leinenkugel’s, but rather the  heat, the miles of walking, and the lack of good rest have all caught up to me, and I am dragging a bit today.  That’s just fine with me, as it was well worth it and I am already looking forward to next year.

I’ll try and post a few pictures and a short trip report in the next few days. 

Viva Osh Vegas!

I can almost taste the beer and brats now

It’s Friday afternoon and I am finishing up a few last things at work before I leave for my vacation.  Where am I going?  To AirVenture of course!!!  Every minute that ticks by I can feel myself getting more and more excited.  On Monday I fly to Illinois and hook up with my friend and fellow RV-7 builder Chad.  Then on Tuesday Chad, I and another RV-7 builder Larry hit the road bound for Oshkosh where we will be camping in Camp Scholler with about 5 more of our RV building brothers.    There is a lot of excitement amongst the group and it looks like this turn up to be the best AirVenture yet.  

 Argh!!!  Three more days… I can’t wait anymore! ;-)

AOPA Air Safety Foundation online courses

I am consistently amazed at the content and quality of the AOPA Air Safety Foundation’s (ASF) online courses.  I’ve completed many of them but the one that has most recently received my interest is the course on aerodynamics titled, Essential Aerodynamics:  Stalls, Spins and Safety.  It’s an exceptional lesson that uses great examples to break down many complicated concepts into simple terms delivering it all to you in a truly interactive experience.

This is just one example of the many online courses they have covering a wide range of topics such as Aging AircraftIFR Charts and  Runway Safety.  All of which are informative, entertaining, and produced to extremely high standards. 

I’ve really enjoyed the courses I’ve taken and I plan to complete them all.  In my opinion the AOPA is one of the best run organizations around, and these course are just one more reason that $39 per year membership fee is money well spent.   You don’t even have to be a member to take these courses, but you are an AOPA member aren’t you?  If not, why not?

IFR Lesson 19: Approaches - NDB SCK (2), LOC SCK, ILS LVK

Lesson Date: 07.13.08
Flight Time: 1.9 D

Back at it again today.  On the agenda, more approaches.  I purposely scheduled a bit longer lesson with Nick so that we could squeeze a more than two approaches into a flight.  With this in mind we set out for a variety of nonprecision and precision approaches.  First would be the NDB RWY 29R into Stockton (I hate NDBs), followed by the LOC RWY 29R approach also into Stockton, and finally the ILS RWY 25R into our home base of Livermore.

After our usual simulated Livermore One departure, we switched over to NorCal Approach to find the frequency jammed as usual.   Nick was able to work in our request for the NDB approach into Stockton and ATC promptly issued us a vector.  As I briefed the approach and configured the avionics, we were issued a new vector with instructions to descend.  It had been a while since I’ve done anyting with NDBs and I felt a little uneasy about my NDB intercept abilities.   Did I mention I that I dislike NDBs?

Continue reading ‘IFR Lesson 19: Approaches - NDB SCK (2), LOC SCK, ILS LVK’

IFR Lesson 18: GPS Approaches - GPS SCK, GPS LVK

Lesson Date: 07.12.08
Flight Time: 1.5 D 

Could it really be this easy?  GPS approaches that is.  I don’t have much experience with GPS, so today’s lesson was quite fun and interesting.  During the years that I owned a Citabria, I thought many times about buying a handheld GPS, but  never did.  Frankly, I never saw the need, and I didn’t want to become dependent on something that wasn’t approved as a primary means of navigation.  It was always my intention to hold out as long as possible, opting to do things the old-fashioned way, by looking at a paper chart.  Now that I am training for my instrument rating I’ve changed my tune and now say… Bring on the GPS!

Before starting the engine, Nick and I spent a little time talking about GPS in general and the GPS receiver in the C172R, the King KLN-89B.  Compared to today’s GPS receivers with their large color screens, moving maps and weather overlays, the 89B is pretty simple.  That being said, it is an IFR certified GPS receiver capable of performing non-precision GPS approaches, so it will do the job just fine.  All of the GPS approaches I will fly in the C172s will be nonprecision approaches.  While precision GPS approaches are increasing in numbers, they require WAAS capable receiver to provide vertical guidance.  The 89B is a getting to be bit old, and WAAS wasn’t even around when the 89B was created.

Continue reading ‘IFR Lesson 18: GPS Approaches - GPS SCK, GPS LVK’

« Previous PageNext Page »




Add to Technorati Favorites

Categories

Calendar

November 2008
S M T W T F S
« Oct    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30